tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1102818414538061422.post1513318638580728107..comments2023-03-22T10:19:52.908-07:00Comments on Citizen Atheist: Defend The FaithCitizen Atheisthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08698767551117539527noreply@blogger.comBlogger9125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1102818414538061422.post-55212312384547268282011-08-27T15:54:30.333-07:002011-08-27T15:54:30.333-07:00I've yet to see evidence. Theories and opinion...I've yet to see evidence. Theories and opinions, yes, but no evidence.Natashanoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1102818414538061422.post-74603614689880407522011-08-27T11:19:13.847-07:002011-08-27T11:19:13.847-07:00You're reading the evidence in this blog. It ...You're reading the evidence in this blog. It will take a while to get it all out, but stay tuned for more posts which will provide evidence that Christians have been duped.Citizen Atheisthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08698767551117539527noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1102818414538061422.post-39115229265186719822011-08-26T16:28:02.105-07:002011-08-26T16:28:02.105-07:00Yes I've seen it but I'm not asking you to...Yes I've seen it but I'm not asking you to prove the nonexistence of God I'm asking you to back up your statement that there is evidence as to such. You stated there was evidence as to the nonexistence of God all I'm asking is that you explain what this evidence is.Natashanoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1102818414538061422.post-78445699171598702282011-08-26T16:07:10.230-07:002011-08-26T16:07:10.230-07:00See my post, "Proving a Negative".See my post, "Proving a Negative".Citizen Atheisthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08698767551117539527noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1102818414538061422.post-77884293690385303382011-08-26T15:12:33.728-07:002011-08-26T15:12:33.728-07:00Well I have yet to be shown any concrete evidence ...Well I have yet to be shown any concrete evidence let alone any evidence at all that proves the nonexistence of God. <br />I have not made any assumptions, most of your blog is full of assumptions, however. All preachers preaching fire and brimstone, out to get your money. Not accepting scientific facts. All of us will get upset when asked to defend their faith. We only give for fear of hell. All I've seen on this blog is you putting all Christians in a box and assuming their all the same. I have not made any assumptions. I have made a statement based on what you have shown to be your beliefs and very simply asked a question.Natashanoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1102818414538061422.post-14642973399723880562011-08-26T04:30:01.240-07:002011-08-26T04:30:01.240-07:00Again you assume that I'm like you. Here'...Again you assume that I'm like you. Here's a big difference: I am willing to accept new evidence and change my mind. Some call it flip-flopping, but I consider it intellectual honesty. You, on the other hand, appear to be a fundamentalist - so that no matter what new evidence presents itself, no matter how damning it is, no matter how strong it is, you refuse to change your mind. If strong evidence for God's existence presented itself, I would believe. But, strong evidence has already presented itself that God does not exist.<br /><br />So, which one of us is really being honest here?Citizen Atheisthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08698767551117539527noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1102818414538061422.post-53274840160593322082011-08-25T17:28:59.092-07:002011-08-25T17:28:59.092-07:00It wouldn't clinch it at all because your doub...It wouldn't clinch it at all because your doubt is so deep. If that mountain crumbled and moved do you really think you'd say "That was God" or would you look for an explanation? <br /><br />I didn't say the Bible is screwed up. It's translated to the best of the translators ability to get the point across. Again, this is why context is so important.Natashanoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1102818414538061422.post-60185543331813961832011-08-25T12:32:07.595-07:002011-08-25T12:32:07.595-07:00What purpose would it serve, indeed. It would cli...What purpose would it serve, indeed. It would clinch the argument for God existing. From there, serious study could be conducted as to the nature of God and whether the Bible is as screwed up as you suggest it just might be. You did say that the scriptures may have been mis-translated.Citizen Atheisthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08698767551117539527noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1102818414538061422.post-27564641029049170832011-08-25T11:48:27.637-07:002011-08-25T11:48:27.637-07:00Ahh, now we are taking snipits out of my comment t...Ahh, now we are taking snipits out of my comment to make an argument. My comment still stands that your not looking at the whole context. Yes the bible as a whole is as truthful as it's parts. You need to look at why it was written and what it's use is. And sometimes you also need to look at how it was translated, words can either lose or gain meaning through translation. <br />I also did not admit that the scripture was false. You once again only quoted a snippet to serve your purpose. I said it was not likely to happen because it wouldn't serve a purpose. Can someone with the faith of a mustard seed move a mountain-yes but not because they felt like it. It's not about the moving of the mountain, it's about the strenghth and depth of faith.Natashanoreply@blogger.com